Showing posts with label Monetary Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Monetary Ethics. Show all posts

6/28/15

Greece; Dear Ben Bernanke; Don't steal from my kids

The Fed did the Europeans a favor.

Joseph Gagnon
former Fed official

"The central banks of the wealthiest countries,
trying to prevent a debt crisis in Europe
from exploding into a global panic,
swept in ...by making it easier
...to borrow American dollars.

With what money from where?

Central banks will make it cheaper
...to borrow [US] dollars,
the dominant currency of trade.

Who is qualified by what metric
to borrow how much from whom?

To get the dollars to lend,
central banks go to the Fed and exchange their currency
for dollars under a special swap program.

What could happen
if a central bank prints currency for collateral
for printed money in return
and then do it again and again
untill gasoline is $10 per gallon?

...The coordinated action was a demonstration
of how interconnected the world financial system is,
and that the debt loads of countries like Italy and Greece
are everyone else's problem, too.

AP

Did some economic and political leaders
bail themselves and their compatriots out of their own mistakes,
by pledging trillions of debt and newly created money,
knowing the consequences would be handed down
to many who may be unaware
including the unborn of following generations?

5/31/15

If a nation prints more money, like cutting a 16 inch pizza into 16 slices instead of 8, is each slice worth less?

Nations are not ruined by one act of violence
but quite often, gradually, and almost imperceptibly
by the depreciation of their currency through excessive quantity

Nicolas Copernicus
Discovered Earth was not the center of the Universe

If Nathaniel Rothschild accumulated gold
essential for supporting an army upon Napoleon’s return
in anticipation of an extensive military conflict
and rapidly increasing government borrowing
and profitably exchanged relatively high priced gold
for lower cost debt
in anticipation of sovereign debt stability
upon Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo in 1815
could current circumstances reflect something like the same thing
only opposite?

Now in modern markets
it is striking that exactly the reverse…applies

Governments all over the world
are about to flood the bond markets with paper
to finance their bank bailouts and economic stimulus plans
and the final bill could amount to more than $6 trillion

…governments are about to need to raise the funds
to fight another Napoleon

This massive new supply of bonds
[could]depress the price of existing bonds

…governments all over the world
have embarked on massive money creation

Peter Cooper
Seeking Alpha
(Hat tip for the Rothchild metaphor)

If Germany’s central bank suspended the right
to redeem gold backed Reichsmarks during World War I
and 170 Reichsmarks bought an ounce of gold in January 1919
why did an ounce of gold cost 87,000,000,000,000 Reichsmarks
in November 1923?

What if the pizza shrinks 
while the number of slices rise?

4/28/13

If Bill Gates and Warren Buffett make about 5% on dividends and 5% oncapital gains on about $100 billion, did they stop by the White Houseto thank Obama for giving them what could be an extra $1,477,351,600over 2 years, by charging America’s children about $1,600 a piece?

President Obama met with Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffett
in the Oval Office this morning.

...During the visit, they also discussed ideas for growing the economy
and making America more competitive including investment in education
to better prepare the next generation
and investing in innovative areas with opportunity for growth.


If Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are worth about $100 billion,
and make about $10 billion per year between long term capitol gaines and dividend interest
could they save about $1,477,351,600 over two years if Obama’s Tax Deal passes?


…….……………………….…………..…Tax Cuts Extended…………….Tax Cuts Expired

Dividends and LT Capital Gains………..$10,000,000,000…………………$10,000,000,000?

Tax Liability……………………………….…..$749,741,250 ……….$1,488,417,050?

Average Tax Rate………………………………..14.99%…………………..……. 29.77%?

$749,741,250 – $1,488,417,050 = about $738,675,800 x 2 years = about $1,477,351,600?

Tax Plan: Tax Cuts Extended vs. Tax Cuts Expired    
Tax Year:  2011
AMT Patch:  AMT Patch in effect


Tax Calculator
 
If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000,
and their portion of the tax cuts cost $120 billion
are America’s elected leaders
about to charge everyone’s kids $1,600 each
to give Bill Gates and Warren Buffett about $1,477 billion?

$120,000,000,000 / 75,000,000 Kids = $1,600 per American Child?

7/21/12

I believe money is fungible

Fungible means interchangeable.

The word comes into play
when (inter alia) earmarked funds end up in a general account.

These funds are then free to be used for purposes other than intended.

Example: You would like to go on a vacation but you have unpaid car repair bills.

A wealthy uncle hears that you are having financial trouble and sends money to help.

However, he would never have agree to pay for your vacation
–- he’s nice, but not that nice.

Once your uncle’s money is deposited into your checking account,
you are free to spend it as you please.

You then get to pay off your bills and go on vacation.

In essence, you paid your bills (a necessity) while your uncle funded your vacation.

http://blog.mises.org/archives/007321.asp#

Fungibility

Fungibility is the property of a good or a commodity
whose individual units are capable of mutual substitution.

Examples of highly fungible commodities [like oil] 
are ...currencies.

It refers only to the ease of exchanging one unit of a commodity
with another unit of the same commodity.

Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungibility

Word for the day: Fungible

1/16/12

Karl Denninger: "Europe, The US, And Continuing Government Fraud"

"Let's face it folks -- it's all a scam at all levels of government.

Borrowing to fund ordinary government operations is nothing else.

And you, as a voter, are both complicit in the fraud and in fact demand it
-- which means you're entitled to exactly nothing
when it comes to those promised entitlements you know can't be paid for."

Karl Denninger

6/30/11

If credit peaksdoes employment, globalization and peace?

 We have lent a huge amount of money to the US


so of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets


 


Frankly speaking, I do have some worries


 


Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao


 


US Insists China Fears Over Debt Unfounded


The Wall Street Journal


 


If Executive Order 6102, signed on April 5, 1933


let the Federal Reserve confiscate gold for $20.67 per troy ounce


and the government raised the price to $35 not long after


 


did the US government devalue the dollar by 41%?


 


The Gold Reserve Act of 1934…


changed the value of the dollar in gold


from $20.67 to $35 per ounce


 


This price remained until August 15, 1971


when President Richard Nixon


announced that the United States


 would no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed value


thus abandoning the gold standard for foreign exchange


 


Wikipedia


Have the leaders of most emerging economies


essentially been stealing their citizens’ savings


by lending money to developed economies


to keep currency exchange rates relatively low


to encourage more sales of manufactured goods?


 


If global central bank foreign exchange reserves more than tripled


as the US dollar fell by ~50% since 2000


did Americans buy manufactured goods from foreign nations


with IOUs that are now worth about half as much?


 


Who is the largest holder of US Treasury debt?


 


What could happen


if a generation of underemployed, underpaid


educated and indebted young adults


become disillusioned by their elders’ financial mismanagement


and seek to identify and punish those responsible?

2/11/11

Would you rather live in the ascendancy of a civilization, or in its decline?

Sun Could Set Suddenly on Superpower as Debt Bites

...what if history is not cyclical and slow-moving but arhythmic, at times almost stationary, but also capable of accelerating suddenly, like a sports car?

Can non-random events cause random effects?


What if collapse does not arrive over a number of centuries but comes suddenly, like a thief in the night?

Great powers and empires are complex systems, which means their construction more resembles a termite hill than an Egyptian pyramid. They operate somewhere between order and disorder...

Such systems can appear to operate quite stably for some time; they seem to be in equilibrium but are, in fact, constantly adapting.

Does complexity increase the likelihood of complication?


But there comes a moment when complex systems "go critical". A very small trigger can set off a phase transition from a benign equilibrium to a crisis.

Complex systems share certain characteristics. A small input to such a system can produce huge, often unanticipated changes, what scientists call the amplifier effect.

The flapping of a single butterfly's wing today produces a tiny change…
…so, in a month's time
a tornado that would have devastated the Indonesian coast doesn't happen
or maybe one that wasn't going to happen does


Ian Stewart
The Mathematics of Chaos


Empires exhibit many of the characteristics of other complex adaptive systems, including the tendency to move from stability to instability quite suddenly. But this fact is rarely recognised because of our addiction to cyclical theories of history. The Bourbon monarchy in France passed from triumph to terror with astonishing rapidity. The sun set on the British Empire almost as suddenly. The Suez crisis in 1956 proved that Britain could not act in defiance of the US in the Middle East, setting the seal on the end of empire.

What are the implications for the US today?

The most obvious point is that imperial falls are associated with fiscal crises: sharp imbalances between revenues and expenditures, and the mounting cost of servicing a mountain of public debt.

Did Spanish money become worth less
after the Emperor borrowed against 100 years of future tax revenue
to pay for war against England?


Think of Spain in the 17th century: already by 1543 nearly two-thirds of ordinary revenue was going on interest on the juros, the loans by which the Habsburg monarchy financed itself.

Did France execute relatively the same strategy
with similar consequences not long after?


Or think of France in the 18th century: between 1751 and 1788, the eve of Revolution, interest and amortisation payments rose from just over a quarter of tax revenue to 62 per cent.

Nations are not ruined by one act of violence
but quite often, gradually, and almost imperceptibly
by the depreciation of their currency through excessive quantity


Nicolas Copernicus
Discovered Earth was not the center of the Universe


Alarm bells should therefore be ringing very loudly indeed in Washington, as the US contemplates a deficit for 2010 of more than $1.64 trillion, about 10 per cent of GDP, for the second year running...

...what is even more terrifying is to consider what ongoing deficit finance could mean for the burden of interest payments as a share of federal revenues.

...the fiscal position of the US is at present worse than that of Greece.

For now, the world still expects the US to muddle through...

...even if rates stay low, recurrent deficits and debt accumulation mean that interest payments consume a rising proportion of tax revenue. And military expenditure is the item most likely to be squeezed to compensate because, unlike mandatory entitlements (social security, Medicaid and Medicare), defence spending is discretionary.

If the US government dramatically increases Treasury debt issuance
while the rest of the world’s purchasing needs fall if global economic growth declines
should US long term interest rates eventually rise to attract investment?


It is, in other words, a pre-programmed reality of US fiscal policy today that the resources available to the Department of Defense will be reduced in the years to come. Indeed, by my reckoning, it is quite likely that the US could be spending more on interest payments than on defence within the next decade.

And remember: half the federal debt in public hands is in the hands of foreign creditors. Of that, a fifth (22 per cent) is held by the monetary authorities of the People's Republic of China, down from 27 per cent in July last year. It may not have escaped your notice that China now has the second-largest economy in the world and is almost certain to be the US's principal strategic rival in the 21st century, particularly in the Asia-Pacific. Quietly, discreetly, the Chinese are reducing their exposure to US Treasuries. Perhaps they have noticed what the rest of the world's investors pretend not to see: that the US is on a completely unsustainable fiscal course, with no apparent political means of self-correcting. That has profound implications not only for the US but also for all countries that have come to rely on it, directly or indirectly, for their security.

If Iran and India cut a deal to deliver more Iranian oil to India
and reduce exports to China
should China resort to military action to prevent it?


Australia's post-war foreign policy has been, in essence, to be a committed ally of the US.

But what if the sudden waning of American power that I fear brings to an abrupt end the era of US hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region? Are we ready for such a dramatic change in the global balance of power?

Judging by what I have heard here since I arrived last Friday, the answer is no. Australians are simply not thinking about such things.

I don't have a clue of what weapons
will be used in World War III
but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones


Albert Einstein


...dramas lie ahead as the nasty fiscal arithmetic of imperial decline drives yet another great power over the edge of chaos.

Niall Ferguson is professor of history at Harvard University.

The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly,
is to fill the world with fools.


Herbert Spencer
Coined the phrase “Survival of the fittest”


12/14/10

If Mitt Romney is worth at least $190 million and makes about 5% of dividends and 5% on capital gains, could he bring in an extra $5,656,178 by charging America’s children about $1,600 a piece?

Should Mitt Romney have disclosed his conflict of interest in his USA Today Op-Ed?

..............................Tax Cuts Extended   Tax Cuts Expired 

Taxable Income........  $18,981,000   $18,990,350?
Tax Liability.............    $2,839,650........$5,622,239?
Average Tax........ Rate    14.95%............29.59%?


$5,622,239 - $2,839,650 = $2,782,589 x 2 years = $5,565,178?

Married, No children
Tax Plan: Tax Cuts Extended vs. Tax Cuts Expired      
Tax Year:  2011
AMT Patch:  AMT Patch in effect


Tax Calculator

If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000,
and their portion of the tax cuts cost $120 billion
are America’s elected leaders
about to charge everyone’s kids $1,600 each
to give all the households making more than $250,000 per year
an average of $70,629.78 each?

$120,000,000,000 / 75,000,000 Kids = $1,600 per American Child?


$120 billion divided by 1,699,000 = $70,629.78?

12/13/10

If US Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) was worth about $19.64 million in 2008, about how much did he just vote himself over the next two years?


The 50 Richest Members of Congress (2008)


If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000, and their portion of the tax cuts is about $120 billion...?

If US congressman Darrell Issa is worth about $303 million and makes about 5% of his net worth per year, could he charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $1,387,836 in Tax Cuts over two years?

Could US Senator John Kerry charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $500,036 in Tax Cuts over two years?

If Britney Spears makes about $64 million per year, could she bring in another $5,876,704 from President Obama's Tax Deal over the next two years?

If Michael Bloomberg makes 5% per year on $20 billion, and pays half his taxes on long term capitol gaines and half on dividend interest, could he bring in an extra $295 million over two years with Obama's Tax Deal?

If Rush Limbaugh makes about $78 million per year, could Obama's Tax Deal give him about $15,324,704 more over the next two years?

If there are about 75 million kids in the United States of America, will congress and the president charge them $12,000 a piece to bail out the financial mismanagement of their parents?

Can any American legislator who votes for a $900 billion deficit increase run as a "fiscal conservative" in 2012?

How could some American legislators opposed to raising the debt ceiling, vote to increase the nation's deficit by $900 billion over 2 years?

If Us Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) was worth about $80.40 million in 2008, about how much did he just vote himself over the next two years?


The 50 Richest Members of Congress (2008)


If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000, and their portion of the tax cuts is about $120 billion...?

If US congressman Darrell Issa is worth about $303 million and makes about 5% of his net worth per year, could he charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $1,387,836 in Tax Cuts over two years?

Could US Senator John Kerry charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $500,036 in Tax Cuts over two years?

If Britney Spears makes about $64 million per year, could she bring in another $5,876,704 from President Obama's Tax Deal over the next two years?

If Michael Bloomberg makes 5% per year on $20 billion, and pays half his taxes on long term capitol gaines and half on dividend interest, could he bring in an extra $295 million over two years with Obama's Tax Deal?

If Rush Limbaugh makes about $78 million per year, could Obama's Tax Deal give him about $15,324,704 more over the next two years?

If there are about 75 million kids in the United States of America, will congress and the president charge them $12,000 a piece to bail out the financial mismanagement of their parents?

Can any American legislator who votes for a $900 billion deficit increase run as a "fiscal conservative" in 2012?

How could some American legislators opposed to raising the debt ceiling, vote to increase the nation's deficit by $900 billion over 2 years?

How could Virginia US Senator Jim Webb explain why he may vote to charge each and every US child about $1,600 each to give US congressman Darrell Issa what could be about $1.3 million in Tax Cuts over the next two years?

If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000, and their portion of the tax cuts is about $120 billion...?

If US congressman Darrell Issa is worth about $303 million and makes about 5% of his net worth per year, could he charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $1,387,836 in Tax Cuts over two years?

Could US Senator John Kerry charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $500,036 in Tax Cuts over two years?

If Britney Spears makes about $64 million per year, could she bring in another $5,876,704 from President Obama's Tax Deal over the next two years?

If Michael Bloomberg makes 5% per year on $20 billion, and pays half his taxes on long term capitol gaines and half on dividend interest, could he bring in an extra $295 million over two years with Obama's Tax Deal?

If Rush Limbaugh makes about $78 million per year, could Obama's Tax Deal give him about $15,324,704 more over the next two years?

If there are about 75 million kids in the United States of America, will congress and the president charge them $12,000 a piece to bail out the financial mismanagement of their parents?

Can any American legislator who votes for a $900 billion deficit increase run as a "fiscal conservative" in 2012?

How could some American legislators opposed to raising the debt ceiling, vote to increase the nation's deficit by $900 billion over 2 years?

How could US Senator Charles E. Schumer explain why he voted to charge each and every US child about $1,600 each to give New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg what could be about $295 million in Tax Cuts over two years?

If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000, and their portion of the tax cuts is about $120 billion...?

If US congressman Darrell Issa is worth about $303 million and makes about 5% of his net worth per year, could he charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $1,387,836 in Tax Cuts over two years?

Could US Senator John Kerry charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $500,036 in Tax Cuts over two years?

If Britney Spears makes about $64 million per year, could she bring in another $5,876,704 from President Obama's Tax Deal over the next two years?

If Michael Bloomberg makes 5% per year on $20 billion, and pays half his taxes on long term capitol gaines and half on dividend interest, could he bring in an extra $295 million over two years with Obama's Tax Deal?

If Rush Limbaugh makes about $78 million per year, could Obama's Tax Deal give him about $15,324,704 more over the next two years?

If there are about 75 million kids in the United States of America, will congress and the president charge them $12,000 a piece to bail out the financial mismanagement of their parents?

Can any American legislator who votes for a $900 billion deficit increase run as a "fiscal conservative" in 2012?

How could some American legislators opposed to raising the debt ceiling, vote to increase the nation's deficit by $900 billion over 2 years?

How could US Congressman Howard Coble explain why he may vote to charge each and every US child about $1,600 each to give US Senator John Kerry what could be about $500,036 in Tax Cuts over two years?

If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000, and their portion of the tax cuts is about $120 billion...?

If US congressman Darrell Issa is worth about $303 million and makes about 5% of his net worth per year, could he charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $1,387,836 in Tax Cuts over two years?

Could US Senator John Kerry charge every US child $12,000 to vote himself about $500,036 in Tax Cuts over two years?

If Britney Spears makes about $64 million per year, could she bring in another $5,876,704 from President Obama's Tax Deal over the next two years?

If Michael Bloomberg makes 5% per year on $20 billion, and pays half his taxes on long term capitol gaines and half on dividend interest, could he bring in an extra $295 million over two years with Obama's Tax Deal?

If Rush Limbaugh makes about $78 million per year, could Obama's Tax Deal give him about $15,324,704 more over the next two years?

If there are about 75 million kids in the United States of America, will congress and the president charge them $12,000 a piece to bail out the financial mismanagement of their parents?

Can any American legislator who votes for a $900 billion deficit increase run as a "fiscal conservative" in 2012?

How could some American legislators opposed to raising the debt ceiling, vote to increase the nation's deficit by $900 billion over 2 years?

The hidden tax increase and job killer in the tax cut deal

The hidden tax increase and job killer in the tax cut deal

"...A glut of government debt should lead to much higher interest rates.

Higher government borrowing also tends to divert savings and investment capital
that would otherwise flow into the jobs-creating private sector.


However, with the Fed engaging in quantitative easing,
...the money needed to buy the additional debt is simply printed.


As such,the nasty side effects have been avoided in the short term.

Instead we are set up for more inflation...

...working Americans will see the real values of their paychecks fall,
as consumer price increases outpace the gains in after tax incomes.


As a result, this plan will do nothing to help our economy.

The benefits of holding taxes low
will be more than mitigated by damage done by larger deficits.


In fact, despite the Fed's efforts to artificially suppress interest rates,
the fear of larger deficits is already driving rates up.


...the only thing this plan will stimulate is larger deficits,
meaning the Fed will be forced to do more, not less QE
in an effort to restrain rates.


...nothing in the plan addresses the fundamental economic imbalances
that underlie our economy and that brought us to the brink of ruin in the first place.


What we really need are massive cuts in government spending so we can have true tax relief. 

...By expanding government and increasing debt,
the plan puts us farther than we have ever been from a real recovery."


Peter Schiff

Pork in the Tax Deal that will cost every American child $12,000

"The bill also now extends dozens of other expiring provisions, usually for a year or two. Among them: help for elementary and secondary school teacher expenses, those who employ people who work on or near Indian reservations, domestic film and television producers, economically depressed areas of Washington, D.C., and areas devastated by 2005's Hurricane Katrina.

"This is a great day for American workers," added Denise Bode, the chief executive officer of the American Wind Energy Association, after learning that the bill would extend a key investment tax credit for a year.

Many of the small breaks are for education and energy interests, which have strong constituencies on Capitol Hill. Seven breaks are education-related, while 11 deal with energy interests, affecting biodiesel and renewable diesel, refined coal, marginal oil and gas wells, and electronic transmission, as well as ethanol and alternative energy sources.

Next year, the same interests could return seeking another extension, said Williams of the Tax Policy Center — and that's what's troublesome about the system.

"In theory, extending these provisions for a year implies they'll look carefully at them next year," he said, "but they rarely do.""

David Lightman

12/12/10

If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000, and their portion of the tax cuts is about $120 billion...?

If about 1,699,000 US households make more than $250,000,
and their portion of the tax cuts cost $120 billion
are America's elected leaders
about to charge everyone's kids $1,600 each
to give all the households making more than $250,000 per year
an average of $70,629.78 each?


$120,000,000,000 / 75,000,000 Kids = $1,600 per American Child


 


$120 billion divided by 1,699,000 = $70,629.78

12/11/10

If Britney Spears makes about $64 million per year, could she bring in another $5,876,704 from President Obama's Tax Deal over the next two years?

If Britney Spears makes about $64 million per year,
compared to the Tax Cuts Expired scenario,
total tax liability for the Obama Plan scenario
could be $2,938,352 higher per year?


.................................Tax Cuts Extended................Tax Cuts Expired

Adjusted Gross Income...............$64,000,000.....................$64,000,000?

*Does not include interest, dividends or capital gains

Tax Liability...................................$22,373,989.....................$25,312,341?

Average Tax Rate.............................34.46%.............................38.98%%"?

$25,312,341 - $22,373,989 = at least $2,938,352 x 2 years = $5,876,704?
The Celebrity 100
Tax Calculator
Single
Tax Plan: Tax Cuts Extended vs. Tax Cuts Expired
Tax Year: 2011
AMT Patch: AMT Patch in effect 

Why should Americans believe the folks who missed it last time, for a strategy that is going to borrow about $12,000 per American child?

"...We should keep in mind President Obama's governing assumption about the economy,
which is that we are in a recovery that is just not proceeding as fast as we need it to.


...If his assumption is correct, a stimulus -- any stimulus,
even one he acknowledges is inadequate or based on the wrong kind of measure
-- that gets us through the next few months
 until the economy "turns around" and "gets moving again"
is a victory.


The problem comes about if it turns out
Obama's governing assumption about the economy is not correct.


In that case,
what he has just agreed to is a massive transfer of private sector debt to the public sector,
and a prolonged period that will see many millions of hitherto middle class Americans
in great economic distress while the federal government does nothing
-- beyond sending out unemployment checks...


The people advising Obama on economic affairs
did not think the financial crisis two years ago would be as bad as it was,
and did not foresee unemployment and underemployment rising to the levels we see today.


This does not guarantee they are wrong about a recovery that just hasn't moved fast enough.

Nor does the historical fact that recessions following asset price crashes
tend to take much longer to turn around than cyclical recessions
like those of twenty and thirty years ago.


The evidence, though, suggests that Obama's hopeful talk
about what the tax cut compromise means
contains a very large component of wishful thinking
-- not just about the politics, but also about the economy."


JB

12/10/10

"Add-ons turn tax cut bill into 'Christmas tree'

"...The tax deal, reached behind the scenes and still informal, now includes ethanol subsidies for rural folks, commuter tax breaks for their cousins in the cities and suburbs and wind and solar grants for the environmentalists — all aimed at winning votes, particularly from reluctant Democrats.

Almost $5 billion in subsidies for corn-based ethanol and a continuing tariff to protect against ethanol imports were wrapped up and placed on the tree Thursday night for farm-state lawmakers and agribusiness lobbyists. Environmentalists won more grants for developers of renewable energy, like wind and solar.

...For urban lawmakers, there's a continuation of about-to-expire tax breaks that could save commuters who use mass transit about $1,000 a year. Other popular tax provisions aimed at increasing production of hybrid automobiles, biodiesel fuel, coal and energy-efficient household appliances would be extended through the end of 2011 under the new add-ons.

The package also includes an extension of two Gulf Coast tax incentive programs enacted after Hurricane Katrina to spur economic development in Mississippi, Louisiana and Alabama.

The ethanol money was added despite a growing congressional opposition to subsidizing the fuel after decades of government support. Last month, 17 Republican and Democratic senators wrote to leaders calling the tax breaks "fiscally indefensible," since there's already a law in place that requires ethanol be blended into gasoline.

"Historically the government has helped a product compete in one of three ways: Subsidize it, protect it from competition or require its use. We understand that ethanol may be the only product receiving all three forms of support from the U.S. government at this time," the senators wrote."

FREDERIC J. FROMMER and MARY CLARE JALONICK

12/9/10

$12,000 per American Child "Obama Tax Cut Plan would Increase Taxes for the Poor"

"...the plan would actually slightly increase taxes for the poorest Americans, economists say -- at a time when some leaders in Washington are trying to bring attention to the nation's widening income disparity.

...the "Make Work Pay" credit enacted under Mr. Obama's stimulus plan would be allowed to expire, and a one-year payroll tax cut would be enacted in its place.

Those on the bottom rung of the income ladder, however, are at a disadvantage. Individuals making under $20,000 per year or households making under $40,000 would receive more money from the "Make Work Pay" credit, since the two percent payroll tax cut would amount to less than $400 or $800.

The difference amounts to just a couple hundred dollars per year...

..."A few dollars a week can mean your bus fare getting to work"...

"If you're making only making $10,000 a year, you're only getting $200 a week
-- and $4 out of $200 is serious money"


"It is a big deal if it's the difference between having lunch one day or not having lunch that day,
or putting breakfast on the table for the kids."


...Mr. Obama campaigned on the platform of revising the tax code to address income disparity.

"This turns that on its head""

Stephanie Condon