2/25/09

Should firearm related sales rise or fall if some believe the executive branch and the Supreme Court are relatively inclined to support civilian weapon restrictions?


Two kinds of morality


 


One which we preach but don’t practice


the other which we practice but seldom preach


 


Bertrand Russell


 


Would the founding fathers


have considered the right to bear arms


a protection for the citizenry against the government


or vice versa?


 


The Supreme Court yesterday


affirmed federal efforts to bar those convicted of crimes


involving domestic violence from owning guns


 


It was the court's first decision concerning gun rights


since last year's landmark decision


recognizing an individual's Second Amendment right


to own a firearm


 


…Justices wrangled over…Congress's decision


 to ban firearms to those convicted


 of "a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence"


 extended to someone convicted of a generic charge of battery


so long as there was a proven domestic relationship


 between the offender and the victim


 


The question was whether gun ownership was barred


because someone had been convicted of a generic law


against the use of force


or whether the law in question


must specifically have as an element


that the victim was in a domestic relationship


with the aggressor


 


…Fewer than half the states have laws


that specifically denominate domestic violence


as an element of a crime


 


Should an American cited for a misdemeanor


for an incident not involving a gun


be barred from owning one?


 


Justices Uphold Ban On Guns for Abusers


Robert Barnes


Washington Post, February 25, 2009



No comments: