Two kinds of morality
One which we preach but don’t practice
the other which we practice but seldom preach
Bertrand Russell
Would the founding fathers
have considered the right to bear arms
a protection for the citizenry against the government
or vice versa?
The Supreme Court yesterday
affirmed federal efforts to bar those convicted of crimes
involving domestic violence from owning guns
It was the court's first decision concerning gun rights
since last year's landmark decision
recognizing an individual's Second Amendment right
to own a firearm
…Justices wrangled over…Congress's decision
to ban firearms to those convicted
of "a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence"
extended to someone convicted of a generic charge of battery
so long as there was a proven domestic relationship
between the offender and the victim
The question was whether gun ownership was barred
because someone had been convicted of a generic law
against the use of force
or whether the law in question
must specifically have as an element
that the victim was in a domestic relationship
with the aggressor
…Fewer than half the states have laws
that specifically denominate domestic violence
as an element of a crime
Should an American cited for a misdemeanor
for an incident not involving a gun
be barred from owning one?
Justices Uphold Ban On Guns for Abusers
Washington Post, February 25, 2009
No comments:
Post a Comment