Wells Fargo's explanation of the adverse employment action is factually incorrect and clearly was not the real reason for the action.
The title of the email in question was titled; "Whistleblower Evidence for the SEC and FINRA: How to Manipulate a Financial Plan"
The reason the explanation was insufficient is Wells Fargo continues the practice of misleading their clients.
How's this for a warning to an employee?;
From: Waillim D. Sevipy Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:32 AM To: Hartzman, George
Subject: RE: Please provide an update on this ethics issue. This is some info from the 10ks etc...
George, I thought we agreed that you would stop this??
Waillim D. Sevipy
.
.
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:34 AM To: Waillim D. Sevipy
Subject: RE: Please provide an update on this ethics issue…
How can I teach ethics and do nothing?
George Hartzman
.
.
From: Waillim D. Sevipy Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:36 AM To: Hartzman, George
Subject: RE: Please provide an update on this ethics issue...
You have been warned to stand down on this, that is all I'm saying.
Waillim D. Sevipy
.
.
Inconsistent treatment involved having unknown persons from management call my clients for what they said was routine supervision that didn't happen to anyone else in the office.
Antagonism.
I was told something to effect that "I didn't want to be marked"
Definitely heightened scrutiny of my work.
No comments:
Post a Comment