The United States government has, I continue to believe
acted egregiously by taking away the traditional rights
held by secured creditors
Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock
If the US Constitution directs Congress to
establish a uniform rule of…laws
on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States
how can the other two branches of government
ignore existing law
Why did the Supreme Court
decide to not act on the merits of the underlying legal issues
saying their assessment was
based on the record and proceedings in this case alone
if the United States legal system represents equal justice for all?
Should some lenders be more cautious
of investing in private American companies
if the US government, with the acquiescence of the Supreme Court
favor unsecured creditors and unions
at the expense of legally secured creditors?
No comments:
Post a Comment