Historically, recessions have been a time when new companies
like Microsoft, get born
and good companies separate themselves from their competition
It makes sense
If failing to plan is planning to fail
should the standard of living and quality of life of those who plan
be higher than those that don’t?
When times are tight, people look for new
less expensive ways to do old things
Necessity breeds invention
If the financial and occupational achievement
of the 3% of Yale University’s class of 1952
who put their goals into writing
equaled the entire net worth of the rest of the graduating class 20 years later
are you more likely to be better off
by planning your work and working your plan?
Therefore, the country that uses this crisis to make its population smarter
and more innovative
and endows its people with more tools and basic research
h to invent new goods and services
is the one that will not just survive but thrive down the road
We might be able to stimulate our way back to stability
but we can only invent our way back to prosperity
If achievement takes less time with a plan
can you get farther faster than those without
and vice versa?
We need everyone at every level to get smarter
We need to do all we can now to get more brains connected
to more capital
to spawn more new companies faster
If life is a room of open doors leading to other open doors
do what you and/or others do or don’t
determine what doors stay open or lock you in or out?
No comments:
Post a Comment