If monthly unemployment appears to have peaked in January 2009
coincident
with the Birth/Death Adjustment’s semi-annual benchmark revision
which subtracted 356,000 jobs (Month 13)
could the appearance of cyclical low water mark be misconstrued
if the Birth Death Adjustment added 134,000 jobs in February
114,000 in March
226,000 April
and 220,000 in May as the unemployment rate spiked?
The great majority of mankind
are satisfied with appearance as though they were realities
and are often more influenced by the things that seem
than those that are
Niccolo Machiavelli
No comments:
Post a Comment