Does Cemala's Susan Schwartz represent Cone family members?
If Cemala gives money to DGI...?
From Action Greensboro/Center City's DGI Maintenance Contract;
In 2009, Susan Schwartz contributed political campaign money to Zack, Robbie and Nancy Vaughan.
From "Greensboro Performing Arts Center Task Force Minutes; "the poll we are suggesting is an awareness poll – not an opinion poll.";
http://hartzman.blogspot.com/2012/03/from-greensboro-performing-arts-center.html
Is Susan Schwartz still a board member of the Greensboro Partnership, which funds DGI?
"The Greensboro Partnership was formed in 2005 from the merger of Greensboro Economic Development Alliance, Action Greensboro, and the Greensboro Chamber of Commerce."
Susan Schwartz, a board member of both Action Greensboro and Downtown Greensboro Inc., who represents the Cemala foundation, which is comprised of Cone family members, enabled Betty Cone's Grassroots Productions and DGI?
I believe money is fungible
If money is fungible, this thing is a mess.
If Greensboro's taxpayers help fund the Greensboro Partnership, and the Partnership refused to release "confidential" information from a study which looks to have been purposefully design to increase the tax and debt burden for our community, and the Partnership says that no taxpayer money was used to create the report, why wouldn't the concept of fungibility negate their argument to not be transparent?
No comments:
Post a Comment