3/24/12

Zack Matheny on Incentives

“I think that we do need to expand the water-sewer pump station out near Rock Creek
where [the American Express data center] is going.

When AmEx comes on line, that pump system’s going to be at maximum capacity.

Why?

We’ve got to increase that,
because what happens if we get the next American Express that needs water and sewer?

Shouldn't Roy Carroll, who profited from the Amex deal
right after they fired 1,500 across town
pay for water and sewer to his outlying properties?

Does the 99% have to pay?

We need to spend that money and we need to upgrade that.

Meaning increased taxes and/or debt
to enrich a campaign contributor?
“The other thing I look at on infrastructure is downtown
and making our downtown look prettier,” Matheny continued.

How much?

Downtown is not pretty enough yet?

We’ve got to push some folks down there,
and we’ve got to step it up a notch.

Meaning impose unwanted regulations upon entrepreneurs
like noise ordinances and sicking the police on them?

My opponent said he’s not for any tax incentives
and would never incentivize real estate.


...I would incentivize how to make those deals happen...

,
and if you can work conjunction with the Downtown Greenway,
because that’s one of the main reasons they’re coming.

And if it’s an incentive,
we’ll help with some street lights and clean up the joint.

Let’s think out of the box, man!

“Let’s clean up the sidewalks," Matheny concluded.

"Let’s get the gum off the sidewalks.

Let’s pressure-wash these things where the hot-dog vendors
have put grease everywhere.

Are downtown hot-dog vendors on notice?

Let’s clean ’em up and make it more aesthetically pleasing
and do that in conjunction with getting more heads in beds.

More heads on the beds of the 1%?

That’s great!

The deal going down on Elm Street going across to the other side of Lee Street,
that is major right there.

Zack Matheny

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

summer's eve rhymes with incentive