One who intends to leave others better off for his having existed.


If The Rhinoceros Times received $26,030 in political advertising in 2007, how much could they not make if "Pay to Play" Ethics Rules are passed?

Yes Weekly: The Business of Elections in Greensboro


Municipal elections are a nearly half-million-dollar industry every odd year in Greensboro. In 2007, more than $450,000 washed through the election system, raised from homebuilders, lawyers and other citizens with a stake in city politics, funneled into the coffers of candidates’ campaign and then drained back out in expenditures for yard signs, newspaper ads, billboard displays, payments to poll workers and rental fees for banquet halls.



…The cost of Greensboro municipal elections has more than tripled since 2001, with the total spent by victorious candidates rising from $73,901 in 2001 to $282,623 in 2007.



…the average candidate usually gets about 10 percent of their funds from small donors — meaning people who gave less than $50.



“It’s much more efficient to raise your cash from the big donors,” [‘Josh Glasser of Common Cause of North Carolina told delegates at a Greensboro Neighborhood Congress meeting on Sept. 12, Glasser continued.’] “That means courting interests that often come before the city council and ask for favorable regulations and favorable rules. If you survey the sitting Greensboro City Council, every single member would have to admit that their largest or second largest donation came from someone connected to the real-estate industry or the developers industry.”



…District 3 candidate George Hartzman, who attended the meeting, argued that reform needs to be taken a step further.


“You have these people who are wanting to do business with the government, and they’re paying for their election. And then they get elected and they put a proposal in front of the people that they paid to get elected. And then the people who got elected vote for the thing that the person wants to have passed. It’s a conflict of interest…. Why aren’t we looking at not letting the people who are contributing to elections not being able to do business with the city for X amount of time before and after they give the money? Doesn’t that seem simple? It’s basic ethics.”


Zack Matheny, the incumbent in the District 3 race, was first elected in 2007 in a contest with four other opponents in which Matheny quickly emerged as the leading fundraiser. Matheny raised a total of $46,358 [while serving on Greensboro’s Zoning Commission] and secured 58.9 percent of the vote in the general election. His opponent, Joe Wilson, raised only $13,795.



…Newspapers are not far behind printers in a ranking of sectors that financially profit from campaigns. Victorious Greensboro city council candidates spent a total of $68,615 on printing in 2007, and $61,351 on newspaper advertising. One newspaper, the conservative-leaning Rhinoceros Times, dominates the trade, pulling in $26,030 in 2007...



Candidate spending, 2007



1. Mayor Yvonne Johnson — $97,201

2. Mayor Pro Tem Sandra Anderson Groat — $46,414

3. District 3 Councilman Zack Matheny — $45,868

4. At-large Councilman Robbie Perkins — $38,968

5. District 5 Councilwoman Trudy Wade — $22,595 ($38,379) *

6. At-large Councilwoman Mary Rakestraw — $16,075

7. District 2 Councilwoman Goldie Wells — $7,520

8. District 4 Councilman Mike Barber — $4,982

9. District 1 Councilwoman Dianne Bellamy-Small — $1,300 (estimated)


* Wade paid Republican consultant Bill Burckley $13,784 in January 2008, two months after the election, for mailings. To cover the bill, she raised $11,575, mainly from individuals connected to the real estate, development and building industries, and loaned herself $2,500.



Jordan Green

Yes Weekly, September 16, 2009

No comments: